"045"

Thursday, June 18, 2009

CORE

Blogger seemed too small a platform for this post.I removed it.Thanks for the comments and of course all the people whom Ive had endless discussions with, after they read CORE.:).:(.

6 comments:

  1. Although most of what you said was at a completely different frequency than the ones my antennas can catch, still like most humans, I would make some comments on it :)

    After reading this piece of text, I found it hard to believe how beautifully you have connected all the dots into one story. Now either this is another one of those cases where the human brain(yours here) has received some signals from the einsteinic band OR this is just another case where a human(you somewhat like most astrologers) has moulded science to suit his whimsical philosophies.

    So we both would never know which of the above was true till you get your thoughts into actions and prove what you "think" here is a fact.

    I would love you to be right because that could lead us closer to the proof of gods non-existence thus allowing me to deny the existence of God with greater probability :)

    Baaki generally toh stud theory hain, padhne mein toh bahut mazza aaya, :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. It has been said again and again everywhere-the west and the east, the Hindu mythology or Buddhist that the most powerful tool..

    Well medically, doctors have been able to study only 30% of brain's working, rest of the functioning is still unknown.

    ReplyDelete
  3. @shivam...that is exactly what im saying...:)

    ReplyDelete
  4. well written. the ideas and concept is brilliant of course. id love to see a tad more of a formal touch in the writing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well all this showed no point of discussion its jus a compilation and ones understanding and response to the text read!...well for all u’ve said.. one can never know the brain’s power limit!..and talking about a parallel universe, hoax, psychotic disorders etc ..there are missing links !..everything kind of contradicts(east to west agreed!) the question is which one’s right!..people agree to what they feel might be more close to kinda reality!..but looking it at a broader perspective evryone’s right at their own end…also like to add the human tendency is to see its own convenience which truth might be easy for him to accept that’s how they protect themselves by having this psychological shield of hypothetical analysis of raw data what u jus did!!..as its an attempt ..its good!...just that this conversation can be endless unless and until something is discovered or some theory crops out!... 

    ReplyDelete